The triaxial compressive mechanical properties and failure characteristics of backfill-rock combined bodies with different interface angles
-
摘要: 为探究交界面倾角β对充填体与围岩组合体(充-岩组合体)三轴力学特性影响规律，开展β为0°、15°、30°、45°和60°的充-岩组合体三轴压缩试验，对比分析了不同交界面倾角组合体的力学特性、破坏特征与强度演化规律。试验结果表明：当β≤30°时，组合体的应力-应变曲线可划分为孔隙压密、弹性变形、塑性变形和破坏发展4个阶段，其破坏特征以充填体压剪破坏为主；随着交界面倾角增加，组合体在达到峰值强度后应力陡降，无明显塑性变形和破坏发展阶段，其破坏特征由充填体内部压剪破坏逐渐转变为沿交界面滑移破坏；组合体的峰值强度随着交界面倾角增加先增大后减小，β=30°时峰值强度达到极大值。基于单弱面理论得到组合体滑移破坏的交界面临界倾角为57°~68°，其中β=60°时组合体发生沿交界面滑移破坏，理论计算与试验结果相吻合。Abstract: This study proposes to explore the effect of interface angles β on the triaxial mechanical properties of backfill and surrounding rock combined bodies(backfill-rock combined bodies)by conducting a triaxial compression experiment of backfill-rock combined bodies with interface angles β of 0°, 15°, 30°, 45° and 60°. This paper compared and analyzed the mechanical properties, failure characteristics and strength evolution patterns of the combined bodies with different interface angles. The experimental results show that: When β≤30°, the stress-strain curve of the combined bodies can be divided into four stages: pore compaction, elastic deformation, plastic deformation and failure development. Its failure characteristics are mainly compression shear failure of the backfill. With the increase of the interface angles, the combined bodies stress drops steeply after reaching the peak strength, without significant plastic deformation or failure development stage. Its failure characteristics gradually change from compression shear failure inside the backfill to sliding failure along the interface. The peak strength of the combined bodies first increases and then decreases with the increase of the interface angles, and peak strength reaches a maximum value when β=30°. Based on the theory of single weak plane, the interface critical angles for sliding failure of the combined bodies is 57° to 68°. Where β=60°, the combined bodies occurred sliding failure surface along the interface, and the results from theoretical calculation confirm the experimental results.
-
图 2 不同围压下组合体应力-应变曲线
Figure 2. Stress-strain curves of the combined bodies with different confining pressure
图 3 不同围压下组合体破坏特征
Figure 3. Failure characteristics of combined bodies with different confining pressures
图 4 组合体峰值强度与围压和交界面倾角的关系
Figure 4. The relationship between peak strength, confining pressure and interface angles of combined bodies
图 6 峰值强度与围压关系(β=0°)
Figure 6. Relationship between peak strength and confining pressure(β=0°)
图 8 剪切应力与法向应力关系(β=60°)
Figure 8. Relationship between shear stress and normal stress(β=60°)
表 1 材料力学参数
Table 1. Mechanicals parameters of materials
试样 单轴抗压强度/MPa 密度/(g·cm-3) 波速/(m·s-1) 充填体 3.12 1.94 2 333 类岩石 11.67 2.24 3 125 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 不同交界面倾角组合体拟合曲线方程
Table 2. Fitting curve equations for combined bodies with different interface angles
倾角/(°) 曲线方程 相关系数R2 0 σ1=3.49+5.93σ3 0.96 15 σ1=3.71+5.49σ3 0.95 30 σ1=4.08+6.02σ3 0.97 45 σ1=3.15+6.47σ3 0.95 60 σ1=2.82+5.79σ3 0.99
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 不同交界面倾角组合体黏聚力和内摩擦角
Table 3. Cohesion and internal friction angle of the combined bodies with different interface angles
倾角/(°) 黏聚力/kPa 内摩擦角/(°) 0 716.15 45.4 15 792.27 43.8 30 831.40 45.7 45 620.09 47.1
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 不同围压下β1和β2
Table 4. β1 and β2 under different confining pressures
σ3/kPa β1/(°) β2/(°) 0 58.8 65.7 100 57.2 67.3 200 — — 300 59.5 65.0 400 58.9 65.6
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 中国煤炭工业协会. 2021煤炭行业发展年度报告[R]. 北京: 中国煤炭工业协会, 2021. [2] 谢和平, 吴立新, 郑德志. 2025年中国能源消费及煤炭需求预测[J]. 煤炭学报, 2019, 44(7): 1949-1960. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201907001.htmXie Heping, Wu Lixin, Zheng Dezhi. Prediction on the energy consumption and coal demand of China in 2025[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2019, 44(7): 1949-1960. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201907001.htm [3] 左建平, 李颖, 李宏杰, 等. 采动岩层全空间"类双曲面"立体移动模型[J]. 矿业科学学报, 2023, 8(1): 1-14. doi: 10.19606/j.cnki.jmst.2023.01.001Zuo Jianping, Li Ying, Li Hongjie, et al. The model of spatial analogous hyperboloid for three-dimensional rock strata movement in mining engineering[J]. Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2023, 8(1): 1-14. doi: 10.19606/j.cnki.jmst.2023.01.001 [4] 黄艳利, 王文峰, 卞正富. 新疆煤基固体废弃物处置与资源化利用研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2021, 49(1): 319-330. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ202101030.htmHuang Yanli, Wang Wenfeng, Bian Zhengfu. Prospects of resource utilization and disposal of coal-based solid wastes in Xinjiang[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2021, 49(1): 319-330. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ202101030.htm [5] 徐文彬, 杨宝贵, 杨胜利, 等. 矸石充填料浆流变特性与颗粒级配相关性试验研究[J]. 中南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2016, 47(4): 1282-1289. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201604026.htmXu Wenbin, Yang Baogui, Yang Shengli, et al. Experimental study on correlativity between rheological parameters and grain grading of coal gauge backfill slurry[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2016, 47(4): 1282-1289. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201604026.htm [6] 张吉雄, 张强, 巨峰, 等. 深部煤炭资源采选充绿色化开采理论与技术[J]. 煤炭学报, 2018, 43(2): 377-389. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201802011.htmZhang Jixiong, Zhang Qiang, Ju Feng, et al. Theory and technique of greening mining integrating mining, separating and backfilling in deep coal resources[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, 43(2): 377-389. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201802011.htm [7] 杨磊, 高富强, 王晓卿. 不同强度比组合煤岩的力学响应与能量分区演化规律[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(S2): 3297-3305. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2020S2009.htmYang Lei, Gao Fuqiang, Wang Xiaoqing. Mechanical response and energy partition evolution of coal-rock combinations with different strength ratios[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 39(S2): 3297-3305. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2020S2009.htm [8] 左建平, 陈岩, 孙运江, 等. 深部煤岩组合体整体破坏的非线性模型研究[J]. 矿业科学学报, 2017, 2(1): 17-24. http://kykxxb.cumtb.edu.cn/article/id/43Zuo Jianping, Chen Yan, Sun Yunjiang, et al. Investigation on whole failure nonlinear model for deep coal-rock combined bodies[J]. Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2017, 2(1): 17-24. http://kykxxb.cumtb.edu.cn/article/id/43 [9] 陈光波, 滕鹏程, 张国华, 等. 不同加载速率下煤岩组合体碎块分形特征与能量传递机制[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2022, 45(8): 115-129. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FIVE202208011.htmChen Guangbo, Teng Pengcheng, Zhang Guohua, et al. Fractal characteristics and energy transfer mechanism of coal-rock combined body fragments under different loading rates[J]. Journal of Chongqing University, 2022, 45(8): 115-129. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FIVE202208011.htm [10] 赵鹏翔, 何永琛, 李树刚, 等. 类煤岩材料煤岩组合体力学及能量特征的煤厚效应分析[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2020, 37(5): 1067-1076. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KSYL202005026.htmZhao Pengxiang, He Yongchen, Li Shugang, et al. Coal thickness effect on mechanics and energy characteristics of coal-rock combination model[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2020, 37(5): 1067-1076. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KSYL202005026.htm [11] 朱卓慧, 冯涛, 宫凤强, 等. 煤岩组合体分级循环加卸载力学特性的实验研究[J]. 中南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2016, 47(7): 2469-2475. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201607039.htmZhu Zhuohui, Feng Tao, Gong Fengqiang, et al. Experimental research of mechanical properties on grading cycle loading-unloading behavior of coal-rock combination bodies at different stress levels[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2016, 47(7): 2469-2475. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201607039.htm [12] 程爱平, 舒鹏飞, 张玉山, 等. 充填体-围岩组合体声发射特征与损伤本构研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2020, 37(6): 1238-1245. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KSYL202006020.htmCheng Aiping, Shu Pengfei, Zhang Yushan, et al. Acoustic emission characteristics and damage constitution of backfill-surrounding rock combination[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2020, 37(6): 1238-1245. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KSYL202006020.htm [13] 陈绍杰, 尹大伟, 胡炳南, 等. 条带充填坚硬顶板与充填体组合系统力学特性试验研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2020, 37(1): 110-117. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KSYL202001013.htmChen Shaojie, Yin Dawei, Hu Bingnan, et al. Study on mechanical characteristics of composite system of hard roof and filling body under strip filling[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2020, 37(1): 110-117. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KSYL202001013.htm [14] 余昕, 谭玉叶, 宋卫东, 等. 充填体包裹岩石组合强度与破坏机理研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2023, 52(1): 30-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD202301004.htmYu Xin, Tan Yuye, Song Weidong, et al. Strength and failure mechanism of the rock-encased by backfills structure[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2023, 52(1): 30-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD202301004.htm [15] 王明旭. 胶结充填体与围岩复合体的力学特性[J]. 煤炭学报, 2019, 44(2): 445-453. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201902012.htmWang Mingxu. Mechanics characteristics of cemented filling and surrounding rock[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2019, 44(2): 445-453. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201902012.htm [16] Liu G S, Li L, Yang X C, et al. A numerical analysis of the stress distribution in backfilled stopes considering nonplanar interfaces between the backfill and rock walls[J]. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 10(3): 271-282. [17] Yu X, Kemeny J, Li J L, et al. 3D observations of fracturing in rock-backfill composite specimens under triaxial loading[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2021, 54(12): 6009-6022. [18] Wu W L, Xu W B, Zuo J P. Effect of inclined interface angle on shear strength and deformation response of cemented paste backfill-rock under triaxial compression[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 279: 122478. [19] 曹吉胜, 戴前伟, 周岩, 等. 考虑界面倾角及分形特性的组合煤岩体强度及破坏机制分析[J]. 中南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2018, 49(1): 175-182. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201801023.htmCao Jisheng, Dai Qianwei, Zhou Yan, et al. Failure mechanism and strength of coal-rock combination bodies considering dip angles and fractal characteristics of interface[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2018, 49(1): 175-182. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201801023.htm [20] 谭学术. 复合岩体力学理论及其应用[M]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 1994: 63-71. [21] 杨同, 徐川, 王宝学, 等. 岩土三轴试验中的黏聚力与内摩擦角[J]. 中国矿业, 2007, 16(12): 104-107. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA200712033.htmYang Tong, Xu Chuan, Wang Baoxue, et al. The cohesive strength and the friction angle in rock-soil triaxial rests[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2007, 16(12): 104-107. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA200712033.htm [22] Jaeger J C. Shear failure of anistropic rocks[J]. Geological Magazine. 1960, 97(1): 65-72. [23] 雍睿, 钟祯, 杜时贵, 等. 岩体结构面基本摩擦角研究现状与展望[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2022, 41(2): 254-270. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX202202004.htmYong Rui, Zhong Zhen, Du Shigui, et al. Review on research advance of basic friction angle of rock joints[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 41(2): 254-270. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX202202004.htm [24] 宋彦琦, 李名, 刘江, 等. 含不同倾角天然软弱夹层的大理岩破坏试验[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2015, 44(4): 623-629. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201504005.htmSong Yanqi, Li Ming, Liu Jiang, et al. Experimental test on marble containing natural weak interlayer of different angles[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2015, 44(4): 623-629. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201504005.htm -
点击查看大图
图(8) / 表(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 248
- HTML全文浏览量: 39
- PDF下载量: 56
- 被引次数: 0