Similar experimental study on the effect of particle size on the creep parameters of Burgers model of granular accumulation
-
摘要: 为研究砂土颗粒材料堆积体在沉降过程中的变形行为,采用分级加载的方式进行三轴压缩蠕变试验,获得3组不同粒径(0.6~0.8 mm、1.0~1.5 mm、2.0~2.5 mm)的玻璃微珠蠕变变形-时间曲线,选取四元件Burgers模型对试验曲线进行拟合分析,得到玻璃微珠蠕变特性表征参数,并建立离散元数值模型对burgers模型参数进行验证。研究结果表明:玻璃微珠在三轴压缩条件下的蠕变特性可采用Burgers模型进行描述,蠕变Burgers模型的4个参数Ek、Em、ηk、ηm与粒径和轴压均呈现负相关关系。将试验拟合得到的宏观Burgers模型参数转换为颗粒流程序中的微观Burgers模型参数,模拟结果与试验结果具有较高的吻合性,对比结果说明颗粒流Burgers模型适用于岩石颗粒蠕变试验的研究。
-
关键词:
- 颗粒堆积体 /
- 蠕变 /
- Burgers四元件模型 /
- 离散元
Abstract: In order to study the deformation behavior of sand granular material accumulation during settlement, this study carried out the triaxial compression creep test by step loading, and obtained three groups of creep deformation-time curves of glass beads with different particle sizes (0.6~0.8 mm, 1.0~1.5 mm, 2.0~2.5 mm).The four element Burgers model was selected to fit and analyze the test curve, from which the parameters of creep characterization of glass beads were obtained.The discrete element numerical model was established to verify the parameters of the Burgers model.Results show that the creep characteristics of glass beads under triaxial compression can be described by the Burgers model.The four parameters Ek、Em、ηk、ηmof the Burgers model have negative correlation with particle size and axial pressure.The macro Burgers model parameters obtained from the test are transformed into the micro Burgers model parameters in the particle flow program.The simulation results are in good agreement with the test results.The comparison results verify that the particle flow Burgers model is suitable for the experimental study of rock particle creep.-
Key words:
- particle accumulation /
- creep /
- four element Burgers model /
- discrete element method
-
表 1 Burgers蠕变模型参数统计
Table 1. Parameter statistics of burgers creep model
粒径/
mm轴压/
MPaEk/MPa Em/MPa ηk/MPa ηm/MPa R2 0.6~0.8 1 1.96E3 1.012E4 1.942E4 4.384E6 0.975 2 1.610E3 9.426E3 2.171E4 2.676E6 0.991 3 1.309E3 6.839E3 1.609E4 2.063E6 0.991 4 1.124E3 7.526E3 1.287E4 1.943E6 0.989 5 8.259E2 3.954E3 7.015E3 1.593E6 0.982 1.0~1.5 1 1.699E3 4.661E3 2.433E4 1.036E7 0.986 2 1.441E3 7.814E3 2.145E4 2.646E6 0.988 3 1.073E3 1.278E4 1.849E4 2.133E6 0.991 4 6.230E2 2.572E4 8.269E3 1.121E6 0.976 5 3.925E2 6.818E3 4.473E3 9.825E5 0.972 2.0~2.5 1 1.018E3 7.743E3 2.185E4 2.883E6 0.983 2 8.220E2 7.875E3 1.879E4 2.639E6 0.984 3 4.898E2 4.273E3 7.561E3 2.485E6 0.991 4 4.667E2 1.659E3 5.820E3 1.255E6 0.991 5 2.226E2 1.062E3 2.546E3 1.012E6 0.983 表 4 不同粒径Burgers模型细观参数
Table 4. Meso parameters of Burgers model with different particle sizes
Burgers模型细观参数 粒径/mm 0.6~0.8 1.0~1.5 2.0~2.5 法向参数 Kmn/(MPa·m) 2.768 8.523 2.390 Cmn/(MPa·m·s) 1 115 1 228 2 277 Kkn/(MPa·m) 0.459 0.491 0.501 Ckn/(MPa·m·s) 4.911 5.591 5.729 切向参数 Kms/(MPa·m) 1.107 3.409 0.956 Cms/(MPa·m·s) 446.0 491.3 910.8 Kks/(MPa·m) 0.184 0.196 0.200 Cks/(MPa·m·s) 1.964 2.237 2.291 摩擦系数fs 0.6 0.6 0.6 表 5 数值模拟与试验稳定蠕变阶段应变值对比
Table 5. omparison of strain values between single particle size simulation and test stable creep stage
颗粒粒径/mm 试验应变值/% 模拟应变值/% 0.6~0.8 0.975 0.900 1.0~1.5 1.525 1.155 2.0~2.5 2.646 2.029 -
[1] Minh N H, Cheng Y P. A DEM investigation of the effect of particle-size distribution on one-dimensional compression[J]. Géotechnique, 2013, 63(1): 44-53. doi: 10.1680/geot.10.P.058 [2] 王宇. 砂岩单轴压缩蠕变试验及对西原本构模型的改进[J]. 兰州工业学院学报, 2020, 27(5): 10-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LZGD202005004.htmWang Yu. Study on uniaxial compression creep test of sandstone and improvement of nishihara model[J]. Journal of Lanzhou Institute of Technology, 2020, 27(5): 10-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LZGD202005004.htm [3] 李延福, 段顺荣, 张地, 等. 高地应力条件下深部砂岩三轴蠕变特性及本构模型[J]. 科技通报, 2022, 38(2): 61-66. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJTB202202010.htmLi Yanfu, Duan Shunrong, Zhang Di, et al. Triaxial creep characteristics and constitutive model of deep sandstone under graded loading[J]. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2022, 38(2): 61-66. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJTB202202010.htm [4] 任奕, 徐邓, 刘建锋, 等. 盐岩三轴蠕变与损伤恢复变形特征研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2021, 17(6): 1789-1795. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BASE202106012.htmRen Yi, Xu Deng, Liu Jianfeng, et al. Deformation characteristics investigation on triaxial creep and damage healing of salt rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2021, 17(6): 1789-1795. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BASE202106012.htm [5] 薛鹏, 周先齐, 蔡燕燕, 等. 饱和珊瑚砂三轴蠕变特性及经验模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(S2): 255-260. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2020S2045.htmXue Peng, Zhou Xianqi, Cai Yanyan, et al. Triaxial creep characteristics and empirical model for saturated coral sand[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(S2): 255-260. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2020S2045.htm [6] 单仁亮, 白瑶, 孙鹏飞, 等. 冻结层状红砂岩三轴蠕变特性及本构模型研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2019, 48(1): 12-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201901002.htmShan Renliang, Bai Yao, Sun Pengfei, et al. Study of triaxial creep mechanical properties and constitutive model of frozen stratified red sandstone[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2019, 48(1): 12-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201901002.htm [7] 杨果岳, 徐运龙, 李良吉, 等. 压实红黏土三轴蠕变特性试验及模型研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2019, 15(3): 727-735. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BASE201903012.htmYang Guoyue, Xu Yunlong, Li Liangji, et al. Research on triaxial creep characteristics test and models of compacted red clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2019, 15(3): 727-735. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BASE201903012.htm [8] 宋勇军, 张磊涛, 任建喜, 等. 冻融环境下红砂岩三轴蠕变特性及其模型研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(5): 841-849. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC202105010.htmSong Yongjun, Zhang Leitao, Ren Jianxi, et al. Triaxial creep properties and model of red sandstone under freeze-thaw environment[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(5): 841-849. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC202105010.htm [9] 范登坡. 不同含石量残坡积土蠕变特性研究[D]. 郑州: 华北水利水电大学, 2019. [10] 张庆建, 王鹏程, 赵永, 等. 基于Burgers模型下泥岩三轴蠕变参数的辨识[J]. 水利水电工程设计, 2020, 39(1): 50-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLSG202001023.htmZhang Qingjian, Wang Pengcheng, Zhao Yong, et al. Identification of tri-axial creep parameters of mudstone based on Burgers model[J]. Design of Water Resources & Hydroelectric Engineering, 2020, 39(1): 50-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLSG202001023.htm [11] 付昱凯, 张子然. 基于蠕变试验及Burgers模型参数分析的三趾马红土长期强度确定[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(2): 735-740. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJS202002046.htmFu Yukai, Zhang Ziran. Long-term strength determination of hipparion red clay based on creep test and paremeter analysis of Burgers model[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2020, 20(2): 735-740. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJS202002046.htm [12] 王贺, 曹辉, 秦秀山. 基于Burgers模型的岩盐蠕变参数试验研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2019, 28(12): 133-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA201912026.htmWang He, Cao Hui, Qin Xiushan. Experimental study on creep parameters of rock salt based on Burgers model[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2019, 28(12): 133-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA201912026.htm [13] 杨珂, 李春晓. 基于Burgers模型的岩石蠕变特性研究[C]// 北京力学会第二十五届学术年会会议论文集. 2019: 1424-1425. [14] Cundall P A, Strack O D L. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies[J]. Géotechnique, 1979, 29(1): 47-65. [15] Kang D H, Yun T S, Lau Y M, et al. DEM simulation on soil creep and associated evolution of pore characteristics[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2012, 39: 98-106. [16] 王涛, 吕庆, 李杨, 等. 颗粒离散元方法中接触模型的开发[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(S2): 4040-4045. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2009S2113.htmWang Tao, Lü Qing, Li Yang, et al. Development of contact model in particle discrete element method[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(S2): 4040-4045. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2009S2113.htm [17] 郭鸿, 郭瑞, 南亚林, 等. 坡积土石混合体蠕变特性的Burgers模型[J]. 中山大学学报: 自然科学版, 2020, 59(6): 64-69. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSDZ202006007.htmGuo Hong, Guo Rui, Nan Yalin, et al. Burgers model of creep properties of colluvial soil-rock mixture[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 2020, 59(6): 64-69. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSDZ202006007.htm [18] 郭鸿, 骆亚生, 王鹏程. 分别、分级加载下压实黄土三轴蠕变特性及模型分析[J]. 水力发电学报, 2016, 35(4): 117-124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SFXB201604014.htmGuo Hong, Luo Yasheng, Wang Pengcheng. Triaxial creep characteristics and models of remolded loess under separate and graded loading[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2016, 35(4): 117-124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SFXB201604014.htm [19] 张学朋, 蒋宇静, 王刚, 等. 基于颗粒离散元模型的岩石蠕变模拟试验[J]. 中南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2015, 46(10): 3914-3921. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201510047.htmZhang Xuepeng, Jiang Yujing, Wang Gang, et al. Creep simulation test of rock based on particle discrete element method[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2015, 46(10): 3914-3921. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201510047.htm [20] 杨振伟, 金爱兵, 周喻, 等. 伯格斯模型参数调试与岩石蠕变特性颗粒流分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(1): 240-248. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201501033.htmYang Zhenwei, Jin Aibing, Zhou Yu, et al. Parametric analysis of Burgers model and creep properties of rock with particle flow code[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(1): 240-248. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201501033.htm [21] 陈宗基, 康文法, 黄杰藩. 岩石的封闭应力、蠕变和扩容及本构方程[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 1991, 10(4): 299-312. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX199104000.htmChen Zongji, Kang Wenfa, Huang Jiefan. On the locked in stress, creep and dilatation of rocks, and the constitutive equations[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1991, 10(4): 299-312. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX199104000.htm [22] 张垚. 基于PFC3D的沥青混合料虚拟试验研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2015. [23] 陈俊, 张东, 黄晓明. 离散元颗粒流软件(PFC)在道路工程中的应用[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2015. [24] Liu Y, Dai Q L, You Z P. Viscoelastic model for discrete element simulation of asphalt mixtures[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 135(4): 324-333.