Experimental study on influence factors in damage-permeability characteristics of loading and unloading coal
-
摘要: 深部煤层开采过程中,多重因素影响着煤体损伤-渗透特性。为揭示采动煤体损伤-渗透特性演化规律,开展了不同工程条件代表的恒围压加轴压(路径1)、恒轴压卸围压(路径2)和同时加轴压卸围压(路径3)3种力学路径下煤体损伤-渗透实验,分析加卸载方式、轴压加载速率、围压卸荷速率以及围压等因素对型煤煤体损伤-渗透特性的影响规律。结果表明,不同加卸载方式显著影响着试样损伤程度,按严重程度排序依次是:路径1<路径2<路径3;试样的抗压强度随加卸载速率的增高而较快达到,损伤程度和渗透率增幅却随之增高;随着围压的增高,损伤的时间响应变慢,渗透率最终恢复程度降低,煤体的损伤、渗透特性具有显著的围压效应。能量累计量随时间的变化呈指数函数关系,损伤扩容后相对渗透率k/k0呈幂函数关系。Abstract: In the process of deep coal seam mining, multiple factors affect the coal body damage-permeability characteristics.In order to reveal the evolution law of coal mining damage-permeability characteristics, the coal damage-permeability experiments under three mechanical paths of fixed confining pressure and increased axial pressure (path 1), fixed axial pressure and decreased confining pressure (path 2), increased axial pressure and decreased confining pressure (path 3) were carried out under different engineering conditions.Then the influence of factors such as loading and unloading methods, axial pressure loading rate, confining pressure unloading rate, and confining pressure on coal damage-permeability characteristics were analyzed.The results show that the different loading and unloading methods significantly affect the degree of sample damage, whose order is: path 1 < path 2 < path 3.The compressive strength of samples is easier to achieve with an increased rate of loading and unloading, but the extent of damage and permeability increase along with it.With the increase of confining pressure, the time response of damage becomes slow and the ultimate recovery degree of permeability decreases.The damage and permeability characteristics of coal have significant confining pressure effects.The cumulative amount of energy changes with time in an exponential function, and the relative permeability k/k0 after damage expansion is in a power function.
-
表 1 实验参数
Table 1. Experimental program parameters
力学路径 编号 瓦斯压力/MPa 初始围压/MPa 初始轴压/MPa 围压卸荷速率/(N·s-1) 轴压加载速率/(N·s-1) 恒围压加轴压
(路径1)1-1 1 3 - - 80 1-2 1 5 - - 40 1-3 1 5 - - 80 1-4 1 5 - - 120 1-5 1 7 - - 80 恒轴压卸围压
(路径2)2-1 1 7 12.5 10 - 2-2 1 7 12.5 15 - 2-3 1 7 12.5 20 - 2-4 1 7 5 10 - 同时加轴压卸围压
(路径3)3-1 1 7 5 10 40 3-2 1 7 5 10 80 3-3 1 7 5 10 120 3-4 1 7 5 15 80 3-5 1 7 5 20 80 表 2 不同卸载条件下AE信号、渗透率与时间的关系
Table 2. The relationship between AE, permeability and time under loading-unloading conditions
实验
编号扩容点时刻t0/s 能量累计量E /104 aJ 相对渗透率k/k0 拟合公式 拟合系数 拟合公式 拟合系数 1-1 383 E=0.0035e0.0127(t-t0) 0.733 9 k/k0=0.18(t-t0)0.2613 0.770 6 1-2 626 E=0.061e0.0017(t-t0) 0.941 9 k/k0=0.539(t-t0)0.0664 0.850 3 1-3 471 E=0.0397e0.0061(t-t0) 0.775 9 k/k0=0.5096(t-t0)0.0777 0.820 8 1-4 507 E=0.0224e0.0103(t-t0) 0.879 6 k/k0=0.6303(t-t0)0.044 0.998 3 1-5 838 E=0.0621e0.0017(t-t0) 0.978 6 k/k0=0.4996(t-t0)0.0737 0.967 5 2-1 586 E=0.581e0.0032(t-t0) 0.905 0 k/k0=0.0937(t-t0)0.4214 0.965 3 2-2 639 E=4.6135e0.0051(t-t0) 0.921 6 k/k0=0.1033(t-t0)0.4353 0.993 9 2-3 655 E=4.8007e0.0068(t-t0) 0.927 1 k/k0=0.0737(t-t0)0.5418 0.995 7 2-4 575 E=0.0683e0.0051(t-t0) 0.923 6 k/k0=0.1272(t-t0)0.3892 0.956 6 3-1 326 E=0.0774e0.0057(t-t0) 0.700 7 k/k0=0.0892(t-t0)0.5035 0.979 5 3-2 239 E=0.0593e0.0091(t-t0) 0.974 4 k/k0=0.1162(t-t0)0.4039 0.983 2 3-3 189 E=0.0389e0.0153(t-t0) 0.964 5 k/k0=0.1243(t-t0)0.4359 0.968 5 3-4 233 E=0.0201e0.01(t-t0) 0.979 4 k/k0=0.1076(t-t0)0.4229 0.809 5 3-5 244 E=0.0345e0.006(t-t0) 0.977 1 k/k0=0.143(t-t0)0.4562 0.889 3 -
[1] 何满潮, 谢和平, 彭苏萍, 等. 深部开采岩体力学研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(16): 2803-2813. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2005.16.001He Manchao, Xie Heping, Peng Suping, et al. Study on rock mechanics in deep mining engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(16): 2803-2813. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2005.16.001 [2] 蔡永博, 王凯, 徐超. 煤岩单体及原生组合体变形损伤特性对比试验研究[J]. 矿业科学学报, 2020, 5(3): 278-283. http://kykxxb.cumtb.edu.cn/article/id/290Cai Yongbo, Wang Kai, Xu Chao. Comparative experimental study on deformation and damage characteristics of single coal rock and primary coal-rock combination[J]. Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2020, 5(3): 278-283. http://kykxxb.cumtb.edu.cn/article/id/290 [3] 齐庆新, 潘一山, 李海涛, 等. 煤矿深部开采煤岩动力灾害防控理论基础与关键技术[J]. 煤炭学报, 2020, 45(5): 1567-1584. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB202005003.htmQi Qingxin, Pan Yishan, Li Haitao, et al. Theoretical basis and key technology of prevention and control of coal-rock dynamic disasters in deep coal mining[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2020, 45(5): 1567-1584. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB202005003.htm [4] 彭杨皓, 杨捷, 程晋国, 等. 煤矿大断面托顶煤巷道变形机理及控制技术研究[J]. 矿业科学学报, 2017, 2(5): 439-448. http://kykxxb.cumtb.edu.cn/article/id/94Peng Yanghao, Yang Jie, Cheng Jinguo, et al. Deformation mechanism and control technology of large section gateway with top coal in coal mine[J]. Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2017, 2(5): 439-448. http://kykxxb.cumtb.edu.cn/article/id/94 [5] Xue Y, Gao F, Liu X G. Effect of damage evolution of coal on permeability variation and analysis of gas outburst hazard with coal mining[J]. Natural Hazards, 2015, 79(2): 999-1013. doi: 10.1007/s11069-015-1888-2 [6] 徐超, 王硕, 王一然, 等. 加卸载速率对含瓦斯煤损伤-渗透时效特性影响试验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2018, 46(5): 93-101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ201805015.htmXu Chao, Wang Shuo, Wang Yiran, et al. Experiments study on effects of loading and unloading rates on damage-permeability aging characteristics of gas-bearing coal[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2018, 46(5): 93-101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ201805015.htm [7] Du F, Wang K, Wang G D, et al. Investigation of the acoustic emission characteristics during deformation and failure of gas-bearing coal-rock combined bodies[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2018, 55: 253-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2018.06.013 [8] 栗婧, 关城, 汪振, 等. 型煤受载破坏表面电荷和微震响应特征及相关性分析[J]. 矿业科学学报, 2020, 5(2): 179-186. http://kykxxb.cumtb.edu.cn/article/id/278Li Jing, Guan Cheng, Wang Zhen, et al. Analysis of surface transient charge and the interdependent response of microseismic signal during the deformation of coal[J]. Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2020, 5(2): 179-186. http://kykxxb.cumtb.edu.cn/article/id/278 [9] 姜永东, 李业, 崔悦震, 等. 声场作用下煤储层渗透性试验研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2017, 42(S1): 154-159. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB2017S1020.htmJiang Yongdong, Li Ye, Cui Yuezhen, et al. Experimental study on characteristics of coal reservoir permeability under acoustic wave[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2017, 42(S1): 154-159. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB2017S1020.htm [10] 刘永茜. 循环载荷作用下煤体渗透率演化的实验分析[J]. 煤炭学报, 2019, 44(8): 2579-2588. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201908033.htmLiu Yongqian. Experimental analysis of coal permeability evolution under cyclic loading[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2019, 44(8): 2579-2588. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201908033.htm [11] 徐超, 付强, 王凯, 等. 载荷方式对深部采动煤体损伤-渗透时效特性影响实验研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2018, 47(1): 197-205. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201801025.htmXu Chao, Fu Qiang, Wang Kai, et al. Effects of the loading methods on the damage-permeability aging characteristics of deep mining coal[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2018, 47(1): 197-205. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201801025.htm [12] 李东印, 王文, 李化敏, 等. 重复加-卸载条件下大尺寸煤样的渗透性研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2010, 27(1): 121-125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3363.2010.01.023Li Dongyin, Wang Wen, Li Huamin, et al. Research on permeability of large-sized coal sample in loading and unloading test[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2010, 27(1): 121-125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3363.2010.01.023 [13] 王辰霖, 张小东, 李贵中, 等. 循环加卸载作用下不同高度煤样渗透性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(10): 2299-2308. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201810011.htmWang Chenlin, Zhang Xiaodong, Li Guizhong, et al. Experimental study on the permeability of coal samples with different heights under cyclic loading and unloading[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 37(10): 2299-2308. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201810011.htm [14] 薛燕光, 张东明, 杨玉顺, 等. 三种应力作用下含瓦斯原煤渗透性分析[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2020, 47(3): 22-26, 31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ENER202003005.htmXue Yanguang, Zhang, Dongming, Yang Yushun, et al. Permeability analysis of gassy raw coal under three stresses[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2020, 47(3): 22-26, 31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ENER202003005.htm [15] Yang D S, Qi X Y, Chen W Z, et al. Anisotropic permeability of coal subjected to cyclic loading and unloading[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2018, 18(8): 04018093. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001229 [16] Chen H D, Cheng Y P, Ren T X, et al. Permeability distribution characteristics of protected coal seams during unloading of the coal body[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics And Mining Sciences, 2014, 71: 105-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.03.018 [17] Chen H D, Cheng Y P, Zhou H X, et al. Damage and permeability development in coal during unloading[J]. Rock Mechanics And Rock Engineering, 2013, 46(6): 1377-1390. doi: 10.1007/s00603-013-0370-2 [18] Jia H Y, Wang K, Xu C, et al. Permeability distribution characteristics of underlying coal seam disturbed by mining activity[J]. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, And Environmental Effects, 2019: 1-16. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/335347110_Permeability_distribution_characteristics_of_underlying_coal_seam_disturbed_by_mining_activity [19] 徐超. 岩浆岩床下伏含瓦斯煤体损伤渗透演化特性及致灾机制研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2015. [20] 尹光志, 王登科, 张东明, 等. 两种含瓦斯煤样变形特性与抗压强度的实验分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(2): 410-417. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2009.02.027Yin Guangzhi, Wang Dengke, Zhang Dongming, et al. Test analysis of deformation characteristics and compressive strengths of two types of coal specimens containing gas[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(2): 410-417. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2009.02.027